Due to the close knit relationship between the family and the press I'm sure the propaganda has rendered you a fan of the royal family, so i felt it important there be an unbias platform of which the truth can be documented, rather than all your opinions be dominated by the well filtered media.
For a country known for having a large population opposed to benefit recipients it amazes me how happy these same individuals are to support a ruling class with tax payers money.
While announcing there is not enough money to support the disabled we pay over 300 million of tax payers money to a single benefit household, the Windsor's.
While these are not the types of people you would find arguing on a tv show called benefit street, that may only come down to their dramatically differing benefit rates,
according to 'Republic', a group that campaigns for a democratic alternative to the Monarchy, the true cost of the Monarchy to the British tax payer is actually £345 million a year - nearly ten times more than the figure published by the Royal Family.
The royal family's security bill, for instance, is picked up by the Metropolitan Police, while the costs of royal visits are borne by local councils.
The British tax payer pays for the Royal family's security, hundreds of servants and wait-staff, utilities on palaces and even personal Royal salaries.
But surely a family leeching such a large amount from its local tax payers should at least be kind and appreciative towards their valued minions ?
Unfortunately not, while for copyright reason I may not be able to publish certain remarks made by royal family members, it would be within the readers interest to see what Prince Phillip had to say about overpopulation in the August 1988, Deutsche press, maybe his clearly sought after eugenics program could start with his own family ?
Well.. they may earn a lot of money from us 'working poor' but at least their not criminals right ?
Wrong actually, October 1964, Queen Elizabeth the 2nd and Prince Phillip visited a Catholic run Kamloops residential school in British Columbia and took ten native children away with them after a picnic, eyewitnesses claimed to have seen Queen Elizabeth having the children bow and kiss her feet before leaving with ten children.
The group that disappeared consisted of seven boys and three girls, ageing from six to fourteen years old.
The grieving parents haven’t seen their children since they left for a picnic with the Royal's on Oct. 10 1964
The man who claimed to witness the abduction of ten fellow residential school children by the Queen of England and her husband in October, 1964 at the Catholic school, died suddenly at the Catholic-run St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver.
William Combes, age 59 and in good health, was scheduled to be a primary witness at the opening session of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State on September 12 in London, England, when he suddenly died under mysterious circumstances.
According to his partner Mae, William was in stable health and was assigned a new doctor at St. Paul’s Hospital.
William was then committed to the hospital for tests, and his health began to immediately deteriorate. He died suddenly of a still-undisclosed cause.
The Vancouver Coroner’s Office have refused to comment on William’s death.
Nethertheless, the arrest warrant for Queen Elizabeth was issued in 2013 by six judges of the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels but was clearly to no avail.
After nearly a year of litigation, Queen Elizabeth 2nd and Prince Phillip, were found guilty in the disappearance of the ten native children from the Kamloops residential school in British Columbia, however arrest warrants like these will never be acknowledged by the Queen
To go a step further, in 2012 a teenage girl's body, who had been missing for over a year, turned up at the Queens Sandringham estate.
The girl had been murdered and her body had been there for around 4 months.
Not something you would expect to find at a Royal household..
The true wealth of the queen is hidden in private trusts and even in the monarchy itself, a google search of the queens net worth reveals a sum around 550 million, however, by allowing assets to be owned by the Monarchy, the royal family can conceal their true value.
Her actual net worth is in the trillions, she still owns 89% of Canadian land, her family own a combined property portfolio of around 8.1 billion pounds, which she receives an annual percentage revenue from this every year.
The Queen also owns 50% of UK coastline, all of reagent street and around half of St James' in London's west end and retail property across the U.K, properties in Oxford, Exeter, Nottingham, Newcastle and Harlow.
The Royal's also own part of the Bluewater retail park in Kent, and other retail parks in Leeds, Milton Keynes, Merseyside, Slough, Swansea, Portsmouth, Harlow, Maidstone, Hampstead, Nottingham, Edinburgh, Warwick, Cheltenham and Jersey.
The Windsor estate controls Ascot race course, golf clubs, hotels, farms and woodlands.
The Royal family's net worth is confidential and exempt from any freedom of information act, but it is estimated to be over 32 trillion dollars.
How is it one family have enough money to singlehandedly end world hunger and we still feel the need to feed them £345 million a year of our hard earned wages ?
The Royal's past isn't so bright either,
Their family actually had a large stake in the slave trade, through the Duke of York and Elizabeth I.
The Duke of York used to brandish his 3000 slaves with the initials 'DY' and Elizabeth I established the Royal African Company to facilitate the transport and sale of slaves.
But the wealth they received by trading African lives is nothing compared to when the Royal family joined with the East India Trading Company to import Opium to China, even though it was illegal in China and The Chinese emperor was strongly against it.
They grew Opium Poppies in India, and processed it in factories on a colossal scale and then shipped it to China and sold it to smugglers.
As a result of this, an estimated twelve million peasants were addicted to Opium, it ruined lives and removed morals.
However, In 1839, the Daoguang Emperor ordered more than a thousand tons of British supplied Opium to be seized and destroyed.
This unfortunately started the Opium wars, it appears the Emperor was not allowed to care for the health of his people as the Crown relied on their Opium addiction profits.
Britain sent a warship named 'The Nemesis' to take on the emperors navy, destroying much of it in a single afternoon.
The Chinese had no choice but to surrender their country and their people to the Opium trade and opened five ports to British trade.
It also doesn't help how the more recent Crown Prince Edward the 8th was a Nazi sympathizer who had to abdicate because he worked against the allies during the war.
The British Royal family are not actually British, they actually changed their name in 1917 because England was fighting in World War One, their true family name is Sax-Coburg&Goetha, they are German, amazingly a video surfaced of Edward and the Queen mother teaching the future queen, Elizabeth 2nd, to do a Nazi salute, it appeared the Monarchy had taken notice of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, in which the entire royal family were slaughtered, and saw fascism as a way of preserving the Monarchy.
Edward even went as far to meet with Hitler in 1937, right before the war as Germany prepared to attack Europe, he can even be found posing in photo's with Hitler's closest henchmen and went on to make pro-Nazi speeches, criticising England's involvement in a press statement in which he openly called for peace.
Prince Phillip even trained in the Nazi Youth and went on to found the world wildlife federation alongside Nazi S.S Officer Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, this turned out to be an organisation focused on depopulation.
All of Prince Phillip's sisters went on to marry high ranking Nazi's.
Strangely enough, the German Eugenics ideas that lead to sterilization and genocide were actually based on the Royal family, Francis Galton, the founder of Eugenics studied the British Royal family and concluded that their positions were the result of superior genes.
I can assure you, if the Nazi's had won the war, the 'Windsor's' would remain in place.
Turning away from all the Nazi sympathising, we can now start on the inbreeding, oh yes, these German Royals are so absorbed with pride they believe their bloodline to be sacred so marriage outside of the royal family was unheard of..
Queen Elizabeth 2nd is married to her second cousin Phillip, just as Queen Victoria married her second cousin, Charles and Diana were 11th cousins as are William and Kate.
This amount of inbreeding within one family comes with biological repercussions, both mental and physical, those within the family who suffer from such ailments are alienated and tucked away out of sight, even pronounced dead in the case of The Queen's first cousins Nerissa and Katherine, who were falsely recorded deceased in 1940 and 1961 within Burke's Peerage & Baronetage which keeps track of the lineage of the 'British' aristocracy.
Katherine Bowes-Lyon and Nerissa Bowes-Lyon, niece's to the Queen Mother and cousin to the Queen, were claimed dead and abandoned in a state-run institution for the mentally disabled, they were not visited or even acknowledged by the Royal family, which their carers were appalled by.
Narissa died alone, with no family presence at her funeral and was given a 'pauper's grave'
(retype)
FBI Agent's have seized 4 tapes of Prince Andrew having sex with a sex slave, A woman who claims that an American investment banker loaned her to rich and powerful friends as an underage “sex slave” has alleged in a US court document that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew. According to one US report the videos contain more than four hours of footage captured by cameras hidden in guest rooms at 62-year-old Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. Agents believe the former Wall Street financier, a registered sex offender, may have intended to try to use them to blackmail his rich and powerful friends – who included Andrew, former President Bill Clinton and scores of other politicians and businessman.
The prince, 54, has strenuously denied claims he slept with Virginia.
She says she worked as the “top girl” in Epstein’s under-age harem for four years.
Virginia, now a 31-year-old married mum of three, alleges in a civil lawsuit that she slept with Andrew when she was 17. she can be seen in photos taken with Andrew, A serving law enforcement officer has confirmed their existence (of the videos) to the Daily Star Sunday on condition of anonymity
A former Buckingham Palace butler has been unmasked as a sexual predator who ran a paedophile ring while serving the Royal Family.
In 1976 he was appointed as butler to the Queen at Buckingham Palace and served there for six years until being transferred to Clarence House where he served the Queen Mother.
Bachelor Paul Kidd, 55, groomed at least one of his teenage victims for sex by taking him for tea with the Queen Mother at Clarence House, it has emerged.
To the public, he had been the urbane gent who waited on the Royals for nine years - first the Queen at the Palace and then her mother.
But behind the facade, Kidd was leading a secret double life as a serial child abuser who molested a string of boys over a 30 year period.
He was finally exposed after one of his victims read a newspaper article in which he boasted about his links to the Royals and talked fondly of Princess Diana and her musical tastes.
Police raided his two bedroom home in St Johns Street, Stalybridge, where they found almost 19,000 pornographic pictures and videos of children.
Included in the haul were some nude pictures of a teenager who officers were able to trace and interview.
Some images were hidden in a safe while others were encrypted on his computer.
Kidd admitted 29 sex charges involving three boys namely indecent assault, sexual activity with a child and the possessing and making of indecent images of children between December 1974 and January 2008.
A teenage boy working at Buckingham Palace revealed he was groomed and sexually abused by a VIP paedophile ring there.
The lad was also assaulted at the Royal Family’s Scottish retreat Balmoral, according to shocking Home Office files, reports the Sunday People.
In a heart breaking note, the boy – then just 16 – told how he was the victim of “exploitation of the highest order”.
The chilling claims could now be the subject of a police investigation into historic allegations of child sex abuse in the 1970s and 80s – linked to MPs and powerful figures.
The disturbing account was passed directly to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan but he ruled it was “not practical” to investigate.
The boy told his parents he had been sexually abused by members of the Royal Household at the Palace.
“I am concerned the Palace could be part of a chain supplying young men to paedophiles in the diplomatic service.” (unusable quote, rearrange n use)
The 16-year-old went to work at the Palace in the early 1970s. After a few months his family noticed he was acting strangely.
A family friend told Exaro: “Things were OK when he first joined the Palace staff.
"After a few months, things started to turn a little strange.”
After what the source described as an “incident” at Balmoral, the royal family’s Scottish home, the boy’s parents were told by a close friend who also worked at Buckingham Palace that their son was being sexually abused there.
The source added: “They got wind of this after an incident at Balmoral when he screamed in the night.”
The concerned friend, who worked for the royals at the time, immediately alerted the boy’s parents.
He told them: “This is something that you should have nothing to do with.”
Reports from the time reveal further details of the boy’s ordeal.
One says his parents discovered a handwritten note from him.
It read: “What Buckingham Palace did for me was exploitation of the highest order.”
The boy’s mother said at the time: “My son was happy and normal until he went there.
"Then he changed completely. He refused to talk to us or discuss what he was up to.”
The boy’s father also claimed that young Palace staff were lavished with expensive gifts for “entertaining men”.
He added: “In some cases Palace officials were involved.
“Afterwards, the servants got good references to take up posts abroad with wealthy employers.”
According to the Home Office files, the desperate parents wrote to Geoffrey Dickens for help.
The MP raised the mother’s concerns with the Home Secretary in 1983.
But Mr Dickens received a reply saying Leon Brittan felt it would not be practical to carry out a detailed investigation.
During his time at Buckingham Palace, the 16-year-old was approached by notorious paedophile Sir Peter Hayman and was asked to work for him in Canada, where he was ambassador.
Hayman has been identified as a member of the VIP paedophile ring operating in Westminster and is known to have had royal connections.
He was desperate to have the boy working for him, even writing to his parents to ask them about taking his son on as a footman. Hayman said the boy would need winter clothes
The parents were so concerned by Hayman’s approach that they attempted to stop their son working for him, the family friend explained.
Exaro has established that the boy’s parents intervened to stop him going to Canada to work for Hayman.
Peter Hayman should be thoroughly investigated.
“He was protected by the Establishment at the time. But the revelations link Buckingham Palace to a paedophile network of MPs and powerful figures that operated over many years in the UK.
Palace officials have already been linked to the notorious brothel the Elm Guest House in South West London.
Police are investigating archives on Hayman in a bid to find his links to other Establishment paedophiles.
"An abuse survivor, known as “Nick” to protect his identity, named one of his many VIP attackers as Hayman.
Nick picked Hayman out from a collection of pictures that Exaro showed to him, placing him at abuse parties with other paedophiles.
why do the royal family have such close ties to pedophila ?
However, these inbreeding, Nazi sympathising, Opium pushing, benefit thieves, have even more to bring to the table, recent reports have come to light showing the royal family has a long history of consuming human blood and being involved in cannibalism.
These recent reports have shown that the family has a long history of drinking human blood and being involved in cannibalism.
A book on medicinal cannibalism has revealed that British Royalty consumed parts of the human body, however, reports also claim this ended in the time of Queen Victoria.
Some reasoning behind the idea of medicinal cannibalism would be in relation to diseases inbreeding families often develop, such as Porphyria.
Since porphyria has been traced in the royal lines to the Spanish, French, English and Habsurg lines in the 15th century, and these lines were extremely inbred, its fair to assume Porphyria can be a result of inbreeding.
Historical victims of the worst, most disfiguring forms may have inspired tales of werewolves and vampires due to their inability to go out in sunlight without the blistering of skin, of which the healing is slow and is associated with scarring and hair growth, especially on the face which, sometimes can give the appearance of a werewolf, leading to speculations that the myths may have had a medical basis.
In most cases of porphyria, blood or heme transfusions can supply some relief from the symptoms, and this is still the main treatment. Interestingly, the heme pigment is robust enough to survive digestion, and is absorbed from the intestine.
This means that it is possible to relieve the symptoms of porphyria by drinking blood, and it appears that this is exactly what these royals did.
Bram Stoker actually based his Count Dracula stories on Vlad the Impaler, a direct ancestor of Prince Charles.
The British Royal family have also been found to have "Royal Disease", more commonly known as hemophilia, which is a mostly inherited genetic disorder that impairs the body's ability to make blood clots, a process needed to stop bleeding. This causes sufferers to bleed longer after an injury, easy bruise, and have an increased risk of bleeding inside joints or the brain.
The conditions of hemophilia can also be temporarily relieved by drinking human blood.
So its clear these medieval methods were used as treatment within the royal family, but did these methods truly die out in Queen Victoria's time ?
For a country known for having a large population opposed to benefit recipients it amazes me how happy these same individuals are to support a ruling class with tax payers money.
While announcing there is not enough money to support the disabled we pay over 300 million of tax payers money to a single benefit household, the Windsor's.
While these are not the types of people you would find arguing on a tv show called benefit street, that may only come down to their dramatically differing benefit rates,
according to 'Republic', a group that campaigns for a democratic alternative to the Monarchy, the true cost of the Monarchy to the British tax payer is actually £345 million a year - nearly ten times more than the figure published by the Royal Family.
The royal family's security bill, for instance, is picked up by the Metropolitan Police, while the costs of royal visits are borne by local councils.
The British tax payer pays for the Royal family's security, hundreds of servants and wait-staff, utilities on palaces and even personal Royal salaries.
But surely a family leeching such a large amount from its local tax payers should at least be kind and appreciative towards their valued minions ?
Unfortunately not, while for copyright reason I may not be able to publish certain remarks made by royal family members, it would be within the readers interest to see what Prince Phillip had to say about overpopulation in the August 1988, Deutsche press, maybe his clearly sought after eugenics program could start with his own family ?
Well.. they may earn a lot of money from us 'working poor' but at least their not criminals right ?
Wrong actually, October 1964, Queen Elizabeth the 2nd and Prince Phillip visited a Catholic run Kamloops residential school in British Columbia and took ten native children away with them after a picnic, eyewitnesses claimed to have seen Queen Elizabeth having the children bow and kiss her feet before leaving with ten children.
The group that disappeared consisted of seven boys and three girls, ageing from six to fourteen years old.
The grieving parents haven’t seen their children since they left for a picnic with the Royal's on Oct. 10 1964
The man who claimed to witness the abduction of ten fellow residential school children by the Queen of England and her husband in October, 1964 at the Catholic school, died suddenly at the Catholic-run St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver.
William Combes, age 59 and in good health, was scheduled to be a primary witness at the opening session of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State on September 12 in London, England, when he suddenly died under mysterious circumstances.
According to his partner Mae, William was in stable health and was assigned a new doctor at St. Paul’s Hospital.
William was then committed to the hospital for tests, and his health began to immediately deteriorate. He died suddenly of a still-undisclosed cause.
The Vancouver Coroner’s Office have refused to comment on William’s death.
Nethertheless, the arrest warrant for Queen Elizabeth was issued in 2013 by six judges of the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels but was clearly to no avail.
After nearly a year of litigation, Queen Elizabeth 2nd and Prince Phillip, were found guilty in the disappearance of the ten native children from the Kamloops residential school in British Columbia, however arrest warrants like these will never be acknowledged by the Queen
To go a step further, in 2012 a teenage girl's body, who had been missing for over a year, turned up at the Queens Sandringham estate.
The girl had been murdered and her body had been there for around 4 months.
Not something you would expect to find at a Royal household..
The true wealth of the queen is hidden in private trusts and even in the monarchy itself, a google search of the queens net worth reveals a sum around 550 million, however, by allowing assets to be owned by the Monarchy, the royal family can conceal their true value.
Her actual net worth is in the trillions, she still owns 89% of Canadian land, her family own a combined property portfolio of around 8.1 billion pounds, which she receives an annual percentage revenue from this every year.
The Queen also owns 50% of UK coastline, all of reagent street and around half of St James' in London's west end and retail property across the U.K, properties in Oxford, Exeter, Nottingham, Newcastle and Harlow.
The Royal's also own part of the Bluewater retail park in Kent, and other retail parks in Leeds, Milton Keynes, Merseyside, Slough, Swansea, Portsmouth, Harlow, Maidstone, Hampstead, Nottingham, Edinburgh, Warwick, Cheltenham and Jersey.
The Windsor estate controls Ascot race course, golf clubs, hotels, farms and woodlands.
The Royal family's net worth is confidential and exempt from any freedom of information act, but it is estimated to be over 32 trillion dollars.
How is it one family have enough money to singlehandedly end world hunger and we still feel the need to feed them £345 million a year of our hard earned wages ?
The Royal's past isn't so bright either,
Their family actually had a large stake in the slave trade, through the Duke of York and Elizabeth I.
The Duke of York used to brandish his 3000 slaves with the initials 'DY' and Elizabeth I established the Royal African Company to facilitate the transport and sale of slaves.
But the wealth they received by trading African lives is nothing compared to when the Royal family joined with the East India Trading Company to import Opium to China, even though it was illegal in China and The Chinese emperor was strongly against it.
They grew Opium Poppies in India, and processed it in factories on a colossal scale and then shipped it to China and sold it to smugglers.
As a result of this, an estimated twelve million peasants were addicted to Opium, it ruined lives and removed morals.
However, In 1839, the Daoguang Emperor ordered more than a thousand tons of British supplied Opium to be seized and destroyed.
This unfortunately started the Opium wars, it appears the Emperor was not allowed to care for the health of his people as the Crown relied on their Opium addiction profits.
Britain sent a warship named 'The Nemesis' to take on the emperors navy, destroying much of it in a single afternoon.
The Chinese had no choice but to surrender their country and their people to the Opium trade and opened five ports to British trade.
It also doesn't help how the more recent Crown Prince Edward the 8th was a Nazi sympathizer who had to abdicate because he worked against the allies during the war.
The British Royal family are not actually British, they actually changed their name in 1917 because England was fighting in World War One, their true family name is Sax-Coburg&Goetha, they are German, amazingly a video surfaced of Edward and the Queen mother teaching the future queen, Elizabeth 2nd, to do a Nazi salute, it appeared the Monarchy had taken notice of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, in which the entire royal family were slaughtered, and saw fascism as a way of preserving the Monarchy.
Edward even went as far to meet with Hitler in 1937, right before the war as Germany prepared to attack Europe, he can even be found posing in photo's with Hitler's closest henchmen and went on to make pro-Nazi speeches, criticising England's involvement in a press statement in which he openly called for peace.
Prince Phillip even trained in the Nazi Youth and went on to found the world wildlife federation alongside Nazi S.S Officer Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, this turned out to be an organisation focused on depopulation.
All of Prince Phillip's sisters went on to marry high ranking Nazi's.
Strangely enough, the German Eugenics ideas that lead to sterilization and genocide were actually based on the Royal family, Francis Galton, the founder of Eugenics studied the British Royal family and concluded that their positions were the result of superior genes.
I can assure you, if the Nazi's had won the war, the 'Windsor's' would remain in place.
Turning away from all the Nazi sympathising, we can now start on the inbreeding, oh yes, these German Royals are so absorbed with pride they believe their bloodline to be sacred so marriage outside of the royal family was unheard of..
Queen Elizabeth 2nd is married to her second cousin Phillip, just as Queen Victoria married her second cousin, Charles and Diana were 11th cousins as are William and Kate.
This amount of inbreeding within one family comes with biological repercussions, both mental and physical, those within the family who suffer from such ailments are alienated and tucked away out of sight, even pronounced dead in the case of The Queen's first cousins Nerissa and Katherine, who were falsely recorded deceased in 1940 and 1961 within Burke's Peerage & Baronetage which keeps track of the lineage of the 'British' aristocracy.
Katherine Bowes-Lyon and Nerissa Bowes-Lyon, niece's to the Queen Mother and cousin to the Queen, were claimed dead and abandoned in a state-run institution for the mentally disabled, they were not visited or even acknowledged by the Royal family, which their carers were appalled by.
Narissa died alone, with no family presence at her funeral and was given a 'pauper's grave'
(retype)
FBI Agent's have seized 4 tapes of Prince Andrew having sex with a sex slave, A woman who claims that an American investment banker loaned her to rich and powerful friends as an underage “sex slave” has alleged in a US court document that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew. According to one US report the videos contain more than four hours of footage captured by cameras hidden in guest rooms at 62-year-old Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. Agents believe the former Wall Street financier, a registered sex offender, may have intended to try to use them to blackmail his rich and powerful friends – who included Andrew, former President Bill Clinton and scores of other politicians and businessman.
The prince, 54, has strenuously denied claims he slept with Virginia.
She says she worked as the “top girl” in Epstein’s under-age harem for four years.
Virginia, now a 31-year-old married mum of three, alleges in a civil lawsuit that she slept with Andrew when she was 17. she can be seen in photos taken with Andrew, A serving law enforcement officer has confirmed their existence (of the videos) to the Daily Star Sunday on condition of anonymity
A former Buckingham Palace butler has been unmasked as a sexual predator who ran a paedophile ring while serving the Royal Family.
In 1976 he was appointed as butler to the Queen at Buckingham Palace and served there for six years until being transferred to Clarence House where he served the Queen Mother.
Bachelor Paul Kidd, 55, groomed at least one of his teenage victims for sex by taking him for tea with the Queen Mother at Clarence House, it has emerged.
To the public, he had been the urbane gent who waited on the Royals for nine years - first the Queen at the Palace and then her mother.
But behind the facade, Kidd was leading a secret double life as a serial child abuser who molested a string of boys over a 30 year period.
He was finally exposed after one of his victims read a newspaper article in which he boasted about his links to the Royals and talked fondly of Princess Diana and her musical tastes.
Police raided his two bedroom home in St Johns Street, Stalybridge, where they found almost 19,000 pornographic pictures and videos of children.
Included in the haul were some nude pictures of a teenager who officers were able to trace and interview.
Some images were hidden in a safe while others were encrypted on his computer.
Kidd admitted 29 sex charges involving three boys namely indecent assault, sexual activity with a child and the possessing and making of indecent images of children between December 1974 and January 2008.
A teenage boy working at Buckingham Palace revealed he was groomed and sexually abused by a VIP paedophile ring there.
The lad was also assaulted at the Royal Family’s Scottish retreat Balmoral, according to shocking Home Office files, reports the Sunday People.
In a heart breaking note, the boy – then just 16 – told how he was the victim of “exploitation of the highest order”.
The chilling claims could now be the subject of a police investigation into historic allegations of child sex abuse in the 1970s and 80s – linked to MPs and powerful figures.
The disturbing account was passed directly to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan but he ruled it was “not practical” to investigate.
The boy told his parents he had been sexually abused by members of the Royal Household at the Palace.
“I am concerned the Palace could be part of a chain supplying young men to paedophiles in the diplomatic service.” (unusable quote, rearrange n use)
The 16-year-old went to work at the Palace in the early 1970s. After a few months his family noticed he was acting strangely.
A family friend told Exaro: “Things were OK when he first joined the Palace staff.
"After a few months, things started to turn a little strange.”
After what the source described as an “incident” at Balmoral, the royal family’s Scottish home, the boy’s parents were told by a close friend who also worked at Buckingham Palace that their son was being sexually abused there.
The source added: “They got wind of this after an incident at Balmoral when he screamed in the night.”
The concerned friend, who worked for the royals at the time, immediately alerted the boy’s parents.
He told them: “This is something that you should have nothing to do with.”
Reports from the time reveal further details of the boy’s ordeal.
One says his parents discovered a handwritten note from him.
It read: “What Buckingham Palace did for me was exploitation of the highest order.”
The boy’s mother said at the time: “My son was happy and normal until he went there.
"Then he changed completely. He refused to talk to us or discuss what he was up to.”
The boy’s father also claimed that young Palace staff were lavished with expensive gifts for “entertaining men”.
He added: “In some cases Palace officials were involved.
“Afterwards, the servants got good references to take up posts abroad with wealthy employers.”
According to the Home Office files, the desperate parents wrote to Geoffrey Dickens for help.
The MP raised the mother’s concerns with the Home Secretary in 1983.
But Mr Dickens received a reply saying Leon Brittan felt it would not be practical to carry out a detailed investigation.
During his time at Buckingham Palace, the 16-year-old was approached by notorious paedophile Sir Peter Hayman and was asked to work for him in Canada, where he was ambassador.
Hayman has been identified as a member of the VIP paedophile ring operating in Westminster and is known to have had royal connections.
He was desperate to have the boy working for him, even writing to his parents to ask them about taking his son on as a footman. Hayman said the boy would need winter clothes
The parents were so concerned by Hayman’s approach that they attempted to stop their son working for him, the family friend explained.
Exaro has established that the boy’s parents intervened to stop him going to Canada to work for Hayman.
Peter Hayman should be thoroughly investigated.
“He was protected by the Establishment at the time. But the revelations link Buckingham Palace to a paedophile network of MPs and powerful figures that operated over many years in the UK.
Palace officials have already been linked to the notorious brothel the Elm Guest House in South West London.
Police are investigating archives on Hayman in a bid to find his links to other Establishment paedophiles.
"An abuse survivor, known as “Nick” to protect his identity, named one of his many VIP attackers as Hayman.
Nick picked Hayman out from a collection of pictures that Exaro showed to him, placing him at abuse parties with other paedophiles.
why do the royal family have such close ties to pedophila ?
However, these inbreeding, Nazi sympathising, Opium pushing, benefit thieves, have even more to bring to the table, recent reports have come to light showing the royal family has a long history of consuming human blood and being involved in cannibalism.
These recent reports have shown that the family has a long history of drinking human blood and being involved in cannibalism.
A book on medicinal cannibalism has revealed that British Royalty consumed parts of the human body, however, reports also claim this ended in the time of Queen Victoria.
Some reasoning behind the idea of medicinal cannibalism would be in relation to diseases inbreeding families often develop, such as Porphyria.
Since porphyria has been traced in the royal lines to the Spanish, French, English and Habsurg lines in the 15th century, and these lines were extremely inbred, its fair to assume Porphyria can be a result of inbreeding.
Historical victims of the worst, most disfiguring forms may have inspired tales of werewolves and vampires due to their inability to go out in sunlight without the blistering of skin, of which the healing is slow and is associated with scarring and hair growth, especially on the face which, sometimes can give the appearance of a werewolf, leading to speculations that the myths may have had a medical basis.
In most cases of porphyria, blood or heme transfusions can supply some relief from the symptoms, and this is still the main treatment. Interestingly, the heme pigment is robust enough to survive digestion, and is absorbed from the intestine.
This means that it is possible to relieve the symptoms of porphyria by drinking blood, and it appears that this is exactly what these royals did.
Bram Stoker actually based his Count Dracula stories on Vlad the Impaler, a direct ancestor of Prince Charles.
The British Royal family have also been found to have "Royal Disease", more commonly known as hemophilia, which is a mostly inherited genetic disorder that impairs the body's ability to make blood clots, a process needed to stop bleeding. This causes sufferers to bleed longer after an injury, easy bruise, and have an increased risk of bleeding inside joints or the brain.
The conditions of hemophilia can also be temporarily relieved by drinking human blood.
So its clear these medieval methods were used as treatment within the royal family, but did these methods truly die out in Queen Victoria's time ?
